If there’s an internet policy that everybody hates, this might well be the one. People on Weibo don’t hold back ranting about it.

“I’m out of here ,” a Sina Weibo user writes.

Weibo has been a unique space where Chinese can disseminate information and express opinions and views with considerable freedom. That’s why weibo has been so successful since its launching in 2009. According to the latest statistics published by China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) in July 2011, among the 485 million Chinese internet users, 195 million were on weibo. Now the government is tightening its grip on this relatively free space, and Chinese are not hesitant to condemn the authoritarian government this time, hoping this will not be the last time they can do it.

A microblogger cites from George Orwell’s 1984, “BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU,” and another virtually shouts out, “Democracy??? Freedom??? Where??? ”

“Our country is really highly civilized. Are we going back to the time of North Korea?” a Sina Weibo user writes sarcastically.

Many comments are bold and humorous:

“I thought of the Culture Revolution, and thought crimes…”

“Now I’ll just be a real onlooker.”

“Everybody dies, and some die of identity verification…”

“To block people’s mouths is more difficult than to block a river.”

Some people threaten to “climb over the wall,” meaning to use proxy servers to get around the Great Firewall the Chinese government put in to control online information. However, it seems that using web proxies really won’t really help if one wants to use weibo without identity verification, although users in China can switch to Twitter through proxies, which is banned in China.

Another way to get around this is to switch to another service that doesn’t require identity verification, such as google+, as suggested by some people, but if the government can require weibo service providers to verify the identities of their users, it can require any service provider to do so, if it comes to it.

To appease its users, Sina Weibo offers free accident insurance to 20 thousand existing users a day who verify their identities, but many users don’t buy it.

“There’re risks involved in identity verification, so they offer you free accident insurance,” a user jokes about Sina’s incentive.

“People around you will start to disappear now! Ping’an Insurance is going to make a lot of money now!” another writes. Ping’an is a big insurance company in China.

Of course, some people are more concerned about the security of their privacy than freedom of speech:

“I’d say, we should first talk about how our private information is not going to be leaked, and then we can talk about identity verification,” a microblogger writes.

“I just verified my information, and immediate regret it. Who’s going to be responsible if my information is leaked?” another writes.

Most people are still waiting to see where this is going. “Take this last chance to post as much as you can,” a microblogger writes, “tomorrow you won’t be able to even if you want .”

Let me first backtrack a little bit. Despite the occasional blocking of sensitive terms and topics (read examples here and here), the Chinese government had been quite lenient with microblogging, or weibo, according to the “Chinese standards” of course. People actually can get information and talk about things on weibo sites the way they can’t anywhere else. Many people also use weibo as a venue to express their dissatisfaction and critical views about the government, officials, or social vile.

But that may change now, as the Beijing authorities finally behaved as it was almost expected to. The City issued a regulation today requiring all the weibo service providers registered in Beijing to require their users to verify their real identities before they can post on weibo sites. The regulation requires the providers to “prohibit and limit users who disseminate harmful information and to report to the police department immediately when they are aware of actions that endanger the safety and security of society or of possible criminal activities.” To emphasize, it reiterates that the service providers must “assist and cooperate with concerned agencies in their regulating effort.”

Since two of the most popular weibo service providers Sina (weibo.com) and Sohu (t.sohu.com) are both registered in Beijing, this regulation can have unprecedented impact on the social media scene in China.

On Sina’s weibo.com, users are enraged by this regulation. “There’s one kind of rapists: because raping everyone has been going so smoothly, [they] are not excited any more,” one user writes, “so [they] figured out a new trick: the rape victims must report their real names so as to satisfy the rapists’ new fetish… They gave this regulating measure an appropriate name—identity verification.”

Many weibo users fire at the government’s and officials’ lack of transparency in comparison with their control over citizens privacy. “It is incredibly difficult to make [the information of] officials’ assets public, but it only takes a piece of paper [for the government] to violate citizens’ privacy,” another user writes. “What is dictatorship? This is it! Have you discussed it with citizens before you made any policy? What is dictatorship? This is it!,” she/he continues.

Another user writes: “My weibo identity is verified, but have your assets been verified? … have your overseas green cards been verified? … has your using government vehicles for private use been verified? … has your using public funds for personal use been verified? … have your shabby construction projects been verified…? Weibo is no more than a social platform, just like people going to coffee shops or tea houses to chat. Have you ever seen anybody required to verify her/his identity to have a coffee?”

A user expresses her/his exasperation by depicting a very gloomy picture: “What’s going to happen after identity verification? What else can happen? Issuing laws to regulate the Internet, followed by prosecution based on speech (wenziyu), and then all those who are slightly critical of today’s society where the government officials conspire with businesses and thugs, where bribery and corruption [are rampant] will be thrown into jail. What else can it be? Today, rumor doesn’t even exist. There’re so many blood-boiling true stories that can’t be all told, and who has the time to spread rumors?”

Some users threaten to leave weibo.com. A user writes, “The day when weibo‘s identity verification takes effect, perhaps will also be the time when [I] say ‘goodbye’ to my friends online… It’s not that I’m afraid of anything, but I just don’t like it… I just don’t like it when I have to verify my identity before I open my mouth to chat… That is not chat… I might as well save the time to figure out things like Yi Jing and baguai.”

Others even threaten to take it to the street or the non-existing ballot booth. A user writes, “When there are fewer people on weibo, there will be more on the streets.” And another writes, “The day when weibo verifies identities is the day I vote with my feet!”

However, among all the angry voices, there’re some from whose who are not intimidated by the regulation. “Who’s scared of whom! If nobody’s scared, those thugs will be scared!” a user writes.

Another user points out that “the identities of most of the opinion leaders on weibo have been verified, which means that actually identity verification has long been applied to the core members of weibo. I hope people won’t see weibo‘s identity verification as intimidating. It’s just a paper tiger. Don’t be intimidated by it and stop talking from now. Just react to it like those who have been verified.”

He has a point. Identity verification has been offered as a service for public figures and celebrities long before the issuance of this regulation. Those with verified accounts are the ones who are the most popular and have the most influence on weibo, and many of them are quite vocal when it comes to commenting on social issues. However, this is also a group of elites who have more leverage confronting the authorities than ordinary citizens, who are more likely to be subject to sanction, often without even being known. The regulation is certainly worrisome.

Since Qin Dynastic in BC, the central government’s control over speech and culture has been consistently tight. There have been numerous periods when intellectuals and dissents were severely persecuted because of their speech or even their potential of speech. There have been a few moments in history when Chinese had a little bit more room to speak up and explore ideas, opinions and expressions, but they were all cut short, often accompanied by fire and blood. Are Chinese still willing to stand up for what we believe in? Is this the beginning of the end of another brief spring of relatively open public forum for information, ideas and expression in China?